Abolishment of 42 amendment or supporting privet players?
Panel Judge's observations on Right to Privacy
What if…there are two possibilities;
1] By debating under fundamental rights that the right to
privacy is included, there are chance that government may play/put forward
amendment to constitution to abolish the 42 amendment (a big black spot of emergency
era!) ;
that prevailed ‘fundamental duties’ over ‘fundamental rights’ Which powered state
to override rights by binding duties over citizens…
Controversially
there is extremely other end possibility. Government may be trying to boil multiple
issues to get one suppressed to benefit from other.
2] The
other possibility, which I see more possible is that, government may deem
rights to privacy; this is offcourse to save personal data collection practices
of mobiles/apps/gadgets from legal/penal actions. Lots of people don’t know
that a photograph/video taken from mobile first goes to mobile maker and many
third party apps and then saves on the device. Same about camera, your Wi-Fi
camera does the same.
Both is contradictory to each-other… and “...जो भी सोये है
खबरों में उनको जगाना नहीं...
If we see the observations of justice here one can easily
notice that the attorney general’s advocacy of government is contradicted by
the judges. Judicial observations are in sync with each other; and judges have mentioned views in very clear words.
Comments